Voice of the Faithful

Voice of the Faithful and the clergy sex abuse scandal

© Michelle Anderson

Mar 19, 2007
This is a Q&A session with the founder of Voice of the Faithful, a group of Catholic layity seeking changes in the church in response to the clergy sex abuse scandal.

What follows is an unedited Q&A session with Peggie Thorp, founder and VOTF editor for In the Vineyard conducted via email. VOTF was created in light of the clergy sex abuse scandal. It should be noted that the opinions in this article do not necessarily represent those of the feature writer.

Q. What prompted the beginning of this organization?

A. Sheer outrage.

Q. What makes you think laity could make a difference?

A. Because the lay voice was the most glaring deficit when we looked at the "how" of so many decades of abuse, lies and cover up.

Q. Do you think you have made one? What have you accomplished?

A. The single most important challenge for Catholics is the establishment of a substantive lay voice. VOTF has placed that challenge on the table and it won't go away. Whether or not more Catholics recognize the call for intentional Catholicism remains to be seen - so far it is not encouraging.

Q. How has the church reacted to you?

A. With disdain, confusion and disingenuous criticism.

Q. What are your goals for the future?

A. No answer given.

Q. Do you think there will come a time when a group like yours will not be necessary?

A. Never. The problem is that we have always been necessary and didn't know it. Now we know it.

Q. What do you see the church doing right?

A. Establishing essential and universal standards for social justice and awareness. However, they don't even do this right all the time (Africa HIV and condoms issue).

Q. What problem areas do you think there are that still need to be addressed?

A. The second most glaring deficit in this Church is its institutionalized dismissal of women and our charisms.

Q. How do you keep an open dialogue with the church when you have harsh criticism to give?

A. Do so with genuine love of Church, which is both leadership and laity.

Q. Are you afraid that if you go too far, there will be retribution (excommunication)?

A. Irrelevant. Personally, I don't believe in excommunication nor do I recognize any prelate's authority in so doing. The triune God exists, period. Faith and grace exist outside the institutional Church as well as inside.

Q. What would you like to say to readers about your organization, faith, and the church?

A. Differed to answer at another time.


The copyright of the article Voice of the Faithful in Catholic Clergy is owned by Michelle Anderson. Permission to republish Voice of the Faithful in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Mar 21, 2007 12:42 PM
Barbara Pytel :
Voice of the Faithful...something new for this cradle Catholic. I see the church as having two types of leaders. The pastoral who love their flock and are there to serve and assist. Then, then are the Power and Control factions that can't be pastoral because they might lose power and control over the flock. It is obvious who is leading the church. I see many pastoral clergy trying to do damage control but the damage is coming with so much power that it is very difficult. It must feel like keeping those spinning plates on dowels going at a circus.
Mar 22, 2007 6:31 AM
Michelle Anderson :
I understand. I come from a parish that has a fabulous staff that is concerned and caring. I've always felt welcomed, had my opinion valued. That's not an easy skill to develop. Speaking with others though, I'm seeing some incredibly horrible experiences. It's an unusual, but not surprising, dichotomy.
2 Comments